By John Chang
Abstract: All the forms of matter and living beings follow the explosion form of the universe, or the universal law. We did not use any formulas or theories, but only the philosophical “metaphysics” to complete the great unity from the galaxy to the quark. This is the highest state of philosophy.
----------------------------------
The forms of all matter and living things follow the explosion form of the universe, or the laws of the universe, such as the form of galaxies; the form of stellar systems; the form of natural objects; the form of plants; the form of lower animals; the form of sperm and eggs of higher animals; The morphology of viruses and bacteria; the morphology of the nervous system; the morphology of cells, etc...
Abstract: All the forms of matter and living beings follow the explosion form of the universe, or the universal law. We did not use any formulas or theories, but only the philosophical “metaphysics” to complete the great unity from the galaxy to the quark. This is the highest state of philosophy.
----------------------------------
The forms of all matter and living things follow the explosion form of the universe, or the laws of the universe, such as the form of galaxies; the form of stellar systems; the form of natural objects; the form of plants; the form of lower animals; the form of sperm and eggs of higher animals; The morphology of viruses and bacteria; the morphology of the nervous system; the morphology of cells, etc...
Fig. 1 All matter in nature obeys the universal law (online picture)
In other words, we did not use any formulas or theories, but only used philosophical “metaphysics” to complete the great unification from the galaxy to the quark. This is the highest state of philosophy, not spiritual chicken soup.
The above examples can also be said to be the so-called theology, which all follow the explosive form of the universe (or the form of God). Religionists or priests use these tricks to establish churches and dojos. Some leaders simply call themselves Gods or “Masters” or engage in “truth and goodness” statements to confuse good people and use them to solicit money. They made some decorative headscarves and clothing, or bald their heads to maintain the church’s brand. If anyone opposed it, they would wage war.
Scientists tried to explain them. For example, Newton spent the rest of his life explaining them, but was unsuccessful. Einstein also spent a whole life trying to unify all the theories, but he was also unsuccessful. It was not a matter of gravitational theory and quantum theory, but a question of whether stones and animals could be unified.
Because they are going in the wrong direction, they all want to use dead things or formulas to complete. In fact, it is not a question of formulas, but a question of philosophy.
References:
1. John Chang: 《Universal law》(2003), Universal Publishing, Sydney, Australia.
In other words, we did not use any formulas or theories, but only used philosophical “metaphysics” to complete the great unification from the galaxy to the quark. This is the highest state of philosophy, not spiritual chicken soup.
The above examples can also be said to be the so-called theology, which all follow the explosive form of the universe (or the form of God). Religionists or priests use these tricks to establish churches and dojos. Some leaders simply call themselves Gods or “Masters” or engage in “truth and goodness” statements to confuse good people and use them to solicit money. They made some decorative headscarves and clothing, or bald their heads to maintain the church’s brand. If anyone opposed it, they would wage war.
Scientists tried to explain them. For example, Newton spent the rest of his life explaining them, but was unsuccessful. Einstein also spent a whole life trying to unify all the theories, but he was also unsuccessful. It was not a matter of gravitational theory and quantum theory, but a question of whether stones and animals could be unified.
Because they are going in the wrong direction, they all want to use dead things or formulas to complete. In fact, it is not a question of formulas, but a question of philosophy.
References:
1. John Chang: 《Universal law》(2003), Universal Publishing, Sydney, Australia.
RSS Feed